1960 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,700 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (150 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 757 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DKW Munga | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | Munga | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3700 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1867 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
