1960 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Mazda 3
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 3 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Munga | 2005 Mazda 3 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | 3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |