1960 DKW Munga vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1960 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 DKW Munga weights approximately 366 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DKW Munga | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | DKW | MCC |
| Model | Munga | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |
