1960 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 532 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Munga | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Ranger |
Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1642 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 74 L |