1960 DKW Munga vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1435 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Munga | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | DKW | Land Rover |
Model | Munga | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 104 L |