1960 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 581 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DKW Munga | 2009 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | DKW | Dodge |
| Model | Munga | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1691 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 83 L |
