1960 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,258 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Munga | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | 3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2258 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |