1960 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Volvo V50
To start off, 2009 Volvo V50 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo V50 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Volvo V50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Munga | 2009 Volvo V50 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | Munga | V50 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 18.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |