1960 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1960 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 DKW Munga weights approximately 510 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Munga | 2010 Tata Nano | |
Make | DKW | Tata |
Model | Munga | Nano |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 37 L |