1960 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 2 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 DKW Munga weights approximately 10 kg more than 2011 Mazda 2.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DKW Munga | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | Munga | 2 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2489 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 43 L |
