1960 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 638 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Munga | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | DKW | Cadillac |
Model | Munga | CTS |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |