1960 DKW Munga vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 727 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford E-Series. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Munga | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | E-Series |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.06:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1837 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 150 L |