1960 DKW Munga vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 175 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Munga | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | DKW | Toyota |
Model | Munga | Matrix |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |