1960 Fairthorpe Electron vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1962 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Fairthorpe Electron would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 303 more horse power than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. (42 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 1385 kg more than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Fairthorpe Electron | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Fairthorpe | Ford |
Model | Electron | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1960 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 42 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 40 L |