1960 Fairthorpe Electron vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1966 Mercury Cougar is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Fairthorpe Electron would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. (42 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Fairthorpe Electron | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Fairthorpe | Mercury |
Model | Electron | Cougar |
Year Released | 1960 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 6392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 42 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2830 mm |