1960 Fairthorpe Electron vs. 1989 Lotus Elan

To start off, 1989 Lotus Elan is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Fairthorpe Electron would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Lotus Elan (165 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. (42 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Lotus Elan weights approximately 530 kg more than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Fairthorpe Electron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Elan (201 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. (66 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1989 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Fairthorpe Electron 1989 Lotus Elan
Make Fairthorpe Lotus
Model Electron Elan
Year Released 1960 1989
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 948 cc 1588 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 42 HP 165 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6600 RPM
Torque 66 Nm 201 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 63 mm 80.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76 mm 79 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 8.2:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 490 kg 1020 kg
Vehicle Length 3360 mm 3810 mm
Vehicle Width 1480 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1240 mm
Wheelbase Size 2060 mm 2260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 65 L