1960 Fairthorpe Electron vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Fairthorpe Electron would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota ES 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota ES 3 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron.
Because 1960 Fairthorpe Electron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Fairthorpe Electron | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
Make | Fairthorpe | Toyota |
Model | Electron | ES 3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 42 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2320 mm |