1960 Fairthorpe Electron vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Fairthorpe Electron would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. (42 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1365 kg more than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. (66 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Fairthorpe Electron | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Fairthorpe | Toyota |
| Model | Electron | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 42 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 66 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 63 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 1855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 87 L |
