1960 Fairthorpe Electron vs. 2011 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2011 Ford Fusion is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Fairthorpe Electron would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Fusion weights approximately 1197 kg more than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron.
Because 1960 Fairthorpe Electron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Fairthorpe Electron | 2011 Ford Fusion | |
| Make | Fairthorpe | Ford |
| Model | Electron | Fusion |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 42 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 1687 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4841 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |
