1960 Fairthorpe Electron vs. 2012 Citroen C5

To start off, 2012 Citroen C5 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Fairthorpe Electron would be higher. At 1,749 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C5 (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. (42 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Citroen C5 weights approximately 1095 kg more than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Fairthorpe Electron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C5 (170 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. (66 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Fairthorpe Electron 2012 Citroen C5
Make Fairthorpe Citroen
Model Electron C5
Year Released 1960 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 948 cc 1749 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 42 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 66 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 63 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76 mm 81 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 490 kg 1585 kg
Vehicle Length 3360 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1480 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2060 mm 2820 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 71 L