1960 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1982 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 (292 HP) has 253 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 140 kg more than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1.
Because 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Ferrari | Volkswagen |
| Model | 256 F1 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 292 HP | 39 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2400 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 40 L |
