1960 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 1983 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1983 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 (292 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 530 kg more than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | 1983 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ferrari | Mazda |
Model | 256 F1 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1960 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2620 mm |