1960 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. (292 HP @ 8600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1102 kg more than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ferrari | Ford |
| Model | 256 F1 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 292 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1662 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 59 L |
