1960 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 (292 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Tundra. (190 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Ferrari | Toyota |
| Model | 256 F1 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 3376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 292 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 100 L |
