1960 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 2,957 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 (292 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (252 HP @ 7150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 850 kg more than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ferrari | Renault |
| Model | 256 F1 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2957 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 292 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 60 L |
