1960 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 (292 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 682 kg more than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1.
Because 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
| Make | Ferrari | Suzuki |
| Model | 256 F1 | Reno |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 292 HP | 126 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1242 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 55 L |
