1960 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (395 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. (292 HP @ 8600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 has manual transmission. 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ferrari | Ford |
Model | 256 F1 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 55 L |