1960 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 (292 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C70. (227 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C70.
Because 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Ferrari | Volvo |
Model | 256 F1 | C70 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 62 L |