1960 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 (292 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2010 Holden Calais. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Calais.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 has manual transmission. 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Ferrari | Holden |
Model | 256 F1 | Calais |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 278 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |