1960 Fiat 600 vs. 1982 Zastava 750
To start off, 1982 Zastava 750 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Fiat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Fiat 600 would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Zastava 750 (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1960 Fiat 600. (20 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Zastava 750 should accelerate faster than 1960 Fiat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Fiat 600 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 750 (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Fiat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Fiat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Fiat 600 | 1982 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Fiat | Zastava |
| Model | 600 | 750 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 633 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 55 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3550 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2010 mm |
