1960 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1967 Ford Fairlane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (202 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1960 Fiat Campagnola. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1960 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 168 kg more than 1960 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Fiat Campagnola | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Campagnola | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1899 cc | 6392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1458 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 125 L |
