1960 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,899 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1960 Fiat Campagnola. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1960 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 470 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1960 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Fiat Campagnola | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Fiat | Lotus |
Model | Campagnola | Elan |
Year Released | 1960 | 1968 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1899 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 59 L |