1960 Ford Falcon vs. 1956 Volvo 120
To start off, 1960 Ford Falcon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Volvo 120 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Falcon weights approximately 125 kg more than 1956 Volvo 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Falcon | 1956 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Falcon | 120 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |