1960 Ford Falcon vs. 1968 Peugeot 204
To start off, 1968 Peugeot 204 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Falcon weights approximately 240 kg more than 1968 Peugeot 204.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Peugeot 204, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Falcon | 1968 Peugeot 204 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Falcon | 204 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |