1960 Ford Falcon vs. 1977 Volvo 260
To start off, 1977 Volvo 260 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Volvo 260 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Falcon | 1977 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Falcon | 260 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 146 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2660 mm |