1960 Ford Falcon vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1982 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Falcon weights approximately 420 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Falcon | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Falcon | Polo |
Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 39 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2400 mm |