1960 Ford Falcon vs. 1989 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Falcon | 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
| Make | Ford | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Falcon | 164 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1490 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2670 mm |
