1960 Ford Falcon vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Debonair
To start off, 1991 Mitsubishi Debonair is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Debonair weights approximately 280 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Debonair, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Falcon | 1991 Mitsubishi Debonair | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Falcon | Debonair |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
