1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2002 Honda Logo
To start off, 2002 Honda Logo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Falcon weights approximately 180 kg more than 2002 Honda Logo.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Falcon | 2002 Honda Logo | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Falcon | Logo |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2370 mm |
