1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2002 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Subaru Outback weights approximately 370 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Falcon | 2002 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | Falcon | Outback |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1490 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2660 mm |
