1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2004 Honda CR-V is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda CR-V weights approximately 398 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 2004 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Falcon | 2004 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Falcon | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1518 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |
