1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Lancia Lybra
To start off, 2006 Lancia Lybra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lancia Lybra weights approximately 308 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lancia Lybra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Falcon | 2006 Lancia Lybra | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Falcon | Lybra |
Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1428 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2600 mm |