1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2006 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Saab 03-Sep weights approximately 410 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Falcon | 2006 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | Falcon | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2680 mm |
