1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S60 weights approximately 449 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Falcon | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Falcon | S60 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1569 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2720 mm |