1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 923 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Falcon | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Falcon | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2950 mm |
