1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2012 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2012 Renault Scenic is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Scenic weights approximately 95 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Falcon | 2012 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | Scenic |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2690 mm |