1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2012 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2012 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Saab 05-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Falcon | 2012 Saab 05-Sep | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | Falcon | 05-Sep |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5009 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1468 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2837 mm |
