1960 Ford Prefect vs. 2008 Mazda 3
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Prefect. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Prefect would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (257 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1960 Ford Prefect. (35 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Prefect.
Because 1960 Ford Prefect is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Prefect. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 3 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Ford Prefect. (70 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Ford Prefect.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Prefect | 2008 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Prefect | 3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 2261 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 257 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |