1960 Ford Taunus vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho
To start off, 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho (78 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1960 Ford Taunus. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho weights approximately 166 kg more than 1960 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho (118 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Ford Taunus. (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Taunus | 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho | |
| Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Taunus | Rancho |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 78 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1132 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |
