1960 Ford Taunus vs. 2000 Honda FCX
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda FCX (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1960 Ford Taunus. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Taunus weights approximately 126 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX.
Because 1960 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Ford Taunus. (111 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Taunus | 2000 Honda FCX | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Taunus | FCX |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 273 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2580 mm |